Every time a breach report surfaces, it often starts with a simple, frustrating phrase: “An employee clicked a malicious link.”
Cue the finger-pointing, retraining, and scathing internal Slack threads. But here’s what we miss:
That employee wasn’t careless. They were trying to be productive.
In 2025’s always-on, app-packed digital workplace, security is invisible when it works—but infuriating when it slows things down. So, people do what they’ve been trained to do by culture, not compliance: they click to move forward.
Let’s break down why smart people make risky decisions, and what IT and security leaders should do beyond phishing training.
It’s Not About Ignorance It’s About Context. In cybersecurity, we often talk about “user error” like it’s a personality trait. It’s not. It's a design and culture flaw.
Most phishing incidents happen when:
Think about it: when your performance is judged on speed and responsiveness, you learn to trust and act not stop and verify.
That’s the workplace environment most companies have unintentionally built.
The Gamification Trap
Yes, phishing simulations matter. But in many companies, they’ve become just another compliance checkbox.
Worse, they:
An employee might ace all simulations… and still fall for a link during a real sprint meeting, multitasking on a personal device, while answering a vendor request.
Security isn't just about testing awareness it’s about supporting judgment under pressure.
When an employee clicks on a link or installs an unapproved tool, it often feels like the best option.
Why?
Because the secure path was:
This is how Shadow IT thrives. Employees need to get their jobs done. When internal tools or policies get in the way, they’ll find “safer-looking” alternatives—even if those choices introduce more risk.
In 2024, a mid-sized U.S. consulting firm suffered a business email compromise (BEC) attack when a project manager clicked a link in a spoofed Dropbox notification.
The reason?
Result: the attacker got access, altered banking details in a live invoice, and redirected $8 million in client funds before it was caught.
Training wasn’t the problem. Context was.
Most tools assume that users will do the right thing. But modern phishing kits are designed to exploit trust:
Even savvy users fall for these because the signals of danger are now masked by the polish of legitimacy.
And when your tech stack bombards users with too many warnings, alerts, or MFA prompts, fatigue sets in. That’s when mistakes happen.
It’s time to stop treating security incidents like individual failures. The system needs a redesign.
These aren’t just buzzwords, they're the architecture of modern, resilient organizations.
What should modern IT leaders do next?
Here’s the truth: your users want to do the right thing.
But your systems and processes may not let them.
Cybersecurity must now balance protection with empathy. Employees aren’t “insiders” waiting to sabotage, they're overworked professionals trying to meet deadlines, often in environments where tools aren’t intuitive, and policies aren’t explained in human terms.
Security design that lacks empathy guarantees friction. Friction breeds workarounds. Workarounds create risk.
These numbers tell a story: your security investment must extend beyond tech it must reach how people think, act, and react.
Security can’t just live in tools it needs to live in culture.
We must move from a culture of blame to a culture of resilience.
Too often, breaches are boiled down to a single bad decision. But that’s misleading and dangerous. That “click” usually sits on top of a long chain of systemic failures: outdated policies, poor UX, alert fatigue, lack of context-aware protection, and leadership that prioritizes speed over security. Blaming the person without examining the system only guarantees the mistake will repeat just with a different name in the incident report.
Think about the hidden messages your culture sends. If employees get praise for responding to clients in under 2 minutes but zero recognition for reporting a suspicious email what behavior do you think they’ll prioritize? Security isn’t just about rules. It’s about incentives, pressure, and how “success” is defined. If security feels like an obstacle, even your best people will work around it. And that’s when breaches stop being if and become when.
It’s not that you shouldn’t trust your employees, it's that you shouldn’t have to rely on perfect judgment 100% of the time. People make mistakes. Systems should account for that. That means investing in layered defense models, intelligent alerts, and seamless user experiences that support good decisions by default. It’s not about zero trust in people, it's about zero reliance on fragile moments of human perfection.
Let’s Build a Human-Centric Security Strategy
Your tech stack isn’t enough. Your people are trying their best. You need security that works with human behavior not against it. Talk to us about designing security architectures that protect and empower. From Zero Trust to behavior-driven policies, we help you bridge the human-tech divide.
In our newsletter, explore an array of projects that exemplify our commitment to excellence, innovation, and successful collaborations across industries.